Technology with a Soul
Technology with a Soul
Something strange has happened in the modern workplace. People spend as much energy proving they are working as they do actually working. Green status lights, quick email replies, chat messages at midnight, endless updates in dashboards. All signals meant to prove presence, not impact.
It is not performance we are measuring anymore. We are measuring visibility.
The digital tools that promised transparency have created an environment where appearances often count more than outcomes. The louder you are, the busier you look, the faster you respond, the more productive you seem. Yet none of this guarantees that you are creating value. In fact, many of the most impactful contributions are invisible at first: quiet problem-solving, deep thinking, or simply removing obstacles so others can thrive. But these rarely show up on the scoreboard.
This is the trap of modern performance. Companies reward the noise of work over the depth of it. Employees learn to play the game, signaling activity instead of pursuing meaning. And over time, organizations find themselves drowning in motion but starving for progress.
Work has always contained an element of performance. Even in traditional offices, people would stay late to be seen by the boss or stack papers neatly to look busy. But digital work has amplified this tendency to an extreme.
Now, every click, every response time, every update can be tracked. Dashboards record activity in real time. Project trackers show who is updating tasks. Messaging apps expose who is βactiveβ and who is βaway.β This visibility was designed to help coordination, but it also created an arms race of appearances.
Employees learn the signals that matter: being the first to reply in the group chat, joining every meeting even if unnecessary, updating dashboards frequently, sending long emails that read like reports. None of these signals necessarily move the business forward, but they create the illusion of commitment.
Appearance replaces essence. The act of being visible becomes more important than the act of being valuable.
This shift has deep consequences. Instead of focusing on what will have the biggest impact, people spread their energy across what will be most noticed. Instead of taking time for deep work, they prioritize rapid responses. Instead of building trust through results, they seek safety in constant visibility. It is a culture of signaling, not substance.
The tragedy of modern performance measurement is that the scoreboard is often broken. Leaders think they are measuring productivity, but in reality, they are measuring activity. The distinction is crucial.
Metrics are usually chosen for their ease of tracking, not their ability to reflect meaning. Hours worked, number of calls, emails sent, tickets closed, response times. All easy to quantify, but often detached from actual outcomes. A person who sends fifty emails a day looks engaged, while someone who spends an afternoon designing a strategy that saves millions may appear idle.
What is easy to measure often has little to do with real impact.
The broken scoreboard creates perverse incentives. Employees chase metrics that make them look good, even if those metrics add no real value. Leaders praise responsiveness, speed, and volume, while overlooking clarity, originality, and long-term thinking. Over time, organizations start mistaking noise for progress, until they can no longer tell the difference.
This is why so many professionals feel exhausted yet unfulfilled. They are working harder than ever, yet they know deep down that much of what they produce is performative. They sense that the scoreboard is not aligned with reality. And when that gap between effort and meaning grows too wide, cynicism sets in.
If the scoreboard is broken, then what should replace it? The answer is not simply to add more metrics. It is to shift what we value. Modern performance must be understood not as the volume of work produced, but as the value of work created.
True performance is not defined by how many tasks you close, how many meetings you attend, or how many hours your green light stays on in the chat application. It is defined by the clarity of your thinking, the depth of your contribution, and the outcomes that result from your effort.
Performance is alignment with purpose. It is the ability to connect daily actions to broader goals, to ensure that every unit of energy spent drives toward something that matters. A single decision that reshapes a process can create more value than hundreds of shallow tasks. A thoughtful conversation with a customer can deliver more insight than a week of reports. Yet these acts often remain invisible in current systems of measurement.
The challenge for leaders is to recognize that performance in modern times cannot be captured by sheer output alone. It must be judged by the quality of outcomes and the sustainability of the people delivering them. Anything less is an incomplete picture.
To escape the performance trap, organizations need a new lens for evaluating work. Numbers alone cannot capture the complexity of modern value creation. Instead, performance should be assessed across three dimensions:
The Impact Lens
Did the work create measurable results for the business, the customer, or the mission of the team?
Impact is about outcomes, not activity. A single project that improves customer satisfaction or revenue is worth more than a hundred busy updates.
The Depth Lens
Did the work demonstrate originality, critical thinking, or long-term value?
Depth cannot be rushed. It requires time for analysis, creativity, and refinement. Without it, organizations risk producing a constant stream of shallow solutions that solve nothing in the long run.
The Human Lens
Did the work strengthen trust, collaboration, and culture, or did it erode them?
Performance that comes at the cost of burnout, mistrust, or toxic competition is not sustainable. True performance leaves people stronger, not weaker.
When these three lenses are applied together, a fuller picture of performance emerges. An employee who generates impact, demonstrates depth, and builds trust is creating far more value than one who simply stays visible.
Frameworks alone will not solve the problem unless cultures shift. Organizations must create environments where thoughtful, meaningful work is celebrated just as much as visible activity. This means redesigning recognition, rewards, and rituals.
Leaders need to actively highlight stories of deep contributions. Instead of praising how quickly a message was answered, they should recognize the project that required patience and persistence. Instead of applauding how many tasks were closed, they should spotlight the one that solved a root cause. By changing what is celebrated, leaders send a powerful signal about what really matters.
Performance reviews must also evolve. Evaluations that rely on volume-based metrics reinforce the wrong behaviors. Evaluations that balance impact, depth, and human contribution guide employees toward meaningful effort. If you only measure what is easy, you will only get what is shallow.
At the cultural level, teams must feel safe to slow down when necessary. Fear-driven urgency creates shortcuts, half-baked ideas, and short-term fixes. Trust-driven focus creates work that lasts. A culture beyond the trap is one where slowing down to think is not seen as laziness, but as the foundation of quality.
The future of work will not be defined by how much noise people make, how quickly they respond, or how busy they look. It will be defined by how much clarity they bring, how much impact they create, and how much trust they leave behind.
The companies that win will be those that measure not just motion, but meaning.